Good Beginners Programs?

All the technical stuff about mixing,MC-ing and making choons.

Good Beginners Programs?

Postby BumblesCrew » Tue May 10, 2005 12:07 pm

Can someone tell me a good beginners program that i can use to start makin tunes as im a novice & the most complicated music program iv used so far is Music Generator on the PS2 :yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:

Any feedback is much appreicated :wink:
Image
User avatar
BumblesCrew
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 2:48 pm
Location: Coleraine,N.Ireland

Postby MXW » Tue May 10, 2005 12:30 pm

Rice crispies Hit generator! :D

Haha nah, try out Fruityloops. :)
MXW
 
Posts: 2365
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 11:26 pm

Postby Chwhynny » Tue May 10, 2005 12:37 pm

Reason and Cubase/Nuendo.
Chwhynny @ Hardcore Underground / RFU Recordingz

For clips and information about my releases visit:

Image
User avatar
Chwhynny
 
Posts: 7148
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:36 pm

Postby christian wagner » Tue May 10, 2005 12:39 pm

Chwhynny wrote:Reason and Cubase/Nuendo.


Not for beginners, no way.

Fruity Loops is THE best option, not reason, as it doesnt offer half intelligent sequencing!
User avatar
christian wagner
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: derbyshire

Postby Chwhynny » Tue May 10, 2005 1:21 pm

christian wagner wrote:
Chwhynny wrote:Reason and Cubase/Nuendo.

Not for beginners, no way.

Fruity Loops is THE best option, not reason, as it doesnt offer half intelligent sequencing!

From my own experience I'd say start with the best stuff and you can't go wrong. Seriously.
Chwhynny @ Hardcore Underground / RFU Recordingz

For clips and information about my releases visit:

Image
User avatar
Chwhynny
 
Posts: 7148
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:36 pm

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 1:39 pm

fruity is better then all the above, wha i say it, drum n bass is made of laptops with no hardware involved in any of the tunes, except a tiny handle of producers, only 2 programs used are reason and fruity

hardware heads usually use logic

fruity is the best overall, for all music, you choose the vsts, and your off
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby MXW » Tue May 10, 2005 1:55 pm

Rogue wrote:fruity is better then all the above, wha i say it, drum n bass is made of laptops with no hardware involved in any of the tunes, except a tiny handle of producers, only 2 programs used are reason and fruity

hardware heads usually use logic

fruity is the best overall, for all music, you choose the vsts, and your off


WTF? :yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud: :yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
MXW
 
Posts: 2365
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 11:26 pm

Postby kal-el » Tue May 10, 2005 2:07 pm

although iv started to use reason now aswell there aint fuk all wrong with fl studio jus when will people fkin realise this.................most people are obviously gonna say wot they use but iv asked this question for fkin nths now and they all do the same thing...........its YOU who creates the end product not the fukin sequencer..................wheres john ferraris? :wink:
User avatar
kal-el
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: scunny

Postby TTE » Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm

I use Fruity Loops... I like it because its warm. :D
Marcus Brigstocke wrote:Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music

WANTED LEGO - TURN OLD LEGO INTO CASH
User avatar
TTE
 
Posts: 13656
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:58 pm
See me on the map

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 2:31 pm

main vsts to get/, for all hardcore :

z3ta
linplug RMiv or similar
absynth

hardware synth is always good to have, last prodigy album was all done on reason, which is 1 time consuming app, the only thing that takes a while in fruity is automation
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby TTE » Tue May 10, 2005 2:33 pm

Rogue wrote:main vsts to get/, for all hardcore :

z3ta
linplug RMiv or similar
absynth

hardware synth is always good to have, last prodigy album was all done on reason, which is 1 time consuming app, the only thing that takes a while in fruity is automation


Mike Oldfield uses FLstudio.
Marcus Brigstocke wrote:Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching pills and listening to repetitive music

WANTED LEGO - TURN OLD LEGO INTO CASH
User avatar
TTE
 
Posts: 13656
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:58 pm
See me on the map

Postby Seagull Dave U4EA » Tue May 10, 2005 2:40 pm

Here's a post I did on another forum, it was answering a similar question and still applies here I think:

"People, u spend too much time agonising over what sequencer to use. Its not what u use, but how u use it. When I first started out, I used Fruity. A few seasoned producers told me it was poor, and I should use Cubase. So I learnt Cubase. Now, some of these same producers are using FL Studio instead of Cubase!

The moral of the story is is NO RIGHT ANSWER. Its down to opinion. Whatever u find most comfortable to use, use it. Its bullshit that suddenly transfereing to Logic will make ur tunes sound good. The only thing that makes ur tunes sound good is YOU. And this applies to instruments, fx, etc. Sure, some vsts/plugins sound better than others, but its down to the user to get the performance out of them.

The best sequencer to use is the one u feel most comfortable with. Don't chop and change coz such and such is the flavour of the month."

:D
Image
:yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
User avatar
Seagull Dave U4EA
 
Posts: 15092
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: London and surrounding counties

Postby Seagull Dave U4EA » Tue May 10, 2005 2:49 pm

Rogue wrote:fruity is better then all the above, wha i say it, drum n bass is made of laptops with no hardware involved in any of the tunes, except a tiny handle of producers, only 2 programs used are reason and fruity

hardware heads usually use logic

fruity is the best overall, for all music, you choose the vsts, and your off


:?:
Image
:yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
User avatar
Seagull Dave U4EA
 
Posts: 15092
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: London and surrounding counties

Postby kal-el » Tue May 10, 2005 2:49 pm

well saidjohn *claps* :wink:
User avatar
kal-el
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: scunny

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 2:50 pm

John Ferraris wrote:
Rogue wrote:fruity is better then all the above, wha i say it, drum n bass is made of laptops with no hardware involved in any of the tunes, except a tiny handle of producers, only 2 programs used are reason and fruity

hardware heads usually use logic

fruity is the best overall, for all music, you choose the vsts, and your off


:?:


:? :?: :arrow:
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby dougal's nan » Tue May 10, 2005 2:53 pm

use a amiga.
CANNY BE DOING WIT ALL DIZ TRANCY BOLLOX BRING BACK DA TUNEZ INNIT LIKE WHOOOO !!!!!!
User avatar
dougal's nan
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: Del Bosca, Boscaland

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 2:56 pm

dougal's nan wrote:use a amiga.


protracker. still download a dougal tune for protracker, octamed you could push 32 joint sterio channels
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby Seagull Dave U4EA » Tue May 10, 2005 3:18 pm

Rogue wrote:
John Ferraris wrote:
Rogue wrote:fruity is better then all the above, wha i say it, drum n bass is made of laptops with no hardware involved in any of the tunes, except a tiny handle of producers, only 2 programs used are reason and fruity

hardware heads usually use logic

fruity is the best overall, for all music, you choose the vsts, and your off


:?:


:? :?: :arrow:


Explain your arguement
Image
:yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
User avatar
Seagull Dave U4EA
 
Posts: 15092
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: London and surrounding counties

Postby Deviance » Tue May 10, 2005 3:32 pm

John Ferraris wrote:Here's a post I did on another forum, it was answering a similar question and still applies here I think:

"People, u spend too much time agonising over what sequencer to use. Its not what u use, but how u use it. When I first started out, I used Fruity. A few seasoned producers told me it was poor, and I should use Cubase. So I learnt Cubase. Now, some of these same producers are using FL Studio instead of Cubase!

The moral of the story is is NO RIGHT ANSWER. Its down to opinion. Whatever u find most comfortable to use, use it. Its bullshit that suddenly transfereing to Logic will make ur tunes sound good. The only thing that makes ur tunes sound good is YOU. And this applies to instruments, fx, etc. Sure, some vsts/plugins sound better than others, but its down to the user to get the performance out of them.

The best sequencer to use is the one u feel most comfortable with. Don't chop and change coz such and such is the flavour of the month."

:D



Not a better word ever said! 8)

I have tried them all and i settled with Logic due to how comfortable I found it to work with. I can use Cubase but I find I can find my way round Logic alot quicker and I am mroe productive in this sequencer than any other. Musically it makes no difference! :)
User avatar
Deviance
 
Posts: 2190
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 9:13 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby christian wagner » Tue May 10, 2005 3:51 pm

Rogue wrote:hardware synth is always good to have, last prodigy album was all done on reason, which is 1 time consuming app, the only thing that takes a while in fruity is automation


quite wrong, basic drum patterns and ideas were drawn out in reason, and some samples were used, it the drums were actully recorded, and it was all done in Protools, see SOS magazine.

No matter what anyone says, cubase / logic have the edge over reason cos it is much more powerful, end of! Fruity loops is catching up quick in terms of features for definate though, and id advise anyone starting out to give it a bash, its not easy to go into cubase and learn it all, its quicker and more of a learning curve to start on easier programs

As for hardware people using logic, thats not true, Logic has always had the highest quality effects units as standard, Try using nuendo / cubase fully, and you will see that it is actully, more powerfull!

You can do 80% of a tune in reason, but the extra 20% (possible most important) cant be done.

I agree with john, there is no right sequencer to use, but, as the question asked it

"Whats shall i start off with"

The answer

"Whatever you feel comfortable with"

Doesnt help!!!!!!

TBH, id go wqoth Reel to Reel Tapes, there the future, apparently ;)
User avatar
christian wagner
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: derbyshire

Postby Freefall » Tue May 10, 2005 3:57 pm

Deviance wrote:I can use Cubase but I find I can find my way round Logic alot quicker and I am mroe productive in this sequencer than any other. Musically it makes no difference! :)


There ya go bruv, try em all out, then go with what one you find easiest, either way you've gotta start from scratch so you may aswell start with something that initially feels comfortable. :D
I wanna hear Dj/Mc TBC. I see him on loads of adverts but have never heard him play!
http://www.blagrecords.co.uk
http://www.myspace.com/blagrecords
Image
User avatar
Freefall
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 9:13 pm
Location: Witham, Essex

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 4:28 pm

cubase is for hardware, and only has 12 channels
i said logic is used by drum n bass hardware producers

when it comes down to it, dark dnb is the most complex music to make, cut things short cos i can be bothered, fruity wins hands down, it can do all and more then cubase, same people who use cubase will own 1210s
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby BumblesCrew » Tue May 10, 2005 4:31 pm

Cheers to everyone for there input :wink:

I`ll just have a blast with a few of them then i see what i can come up with.
Image
User avatar
BumblesCrew
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2002 2:48 pm
Location: Coleraine,N.Ireland

Postby Seagull Dave U4EA » Tue May 10, 2005 4:36 pm

Rogue wrote:cubase is for hardware, and only has 12 channels
i said logic is used by drum n bass hardware producers

when it comes down to it, dark dnb is the most complex music to make, cut things short cos i can be bothered, fruity wins hands down, it can do all and more then cubase, same people who use cubase will own 1210s


But you're talking twoddle mate. (windup account?)
Image
:yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
User avatar
Seagull Dave U4EA
 
Posts: 15092
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: London and surrounding counties

Postby DJ_Stormtrooper » Tue May 10, 2005 5:02 pm

If I was starting out, id try everything out for myself and then make a decision. All sequencers are effectively the same thing with a different interface attatched and there apparent level of simplicity is down to the end user and how he/she gets on with it.

For example, some people will stroll thru Cubase SX with the greatest of ease, but sit them down with Logic and they'll be scratching there heads until they develop bold patches..... This is simply because they dont know the program, give them a few days and they will be well away.

There is no better than, well there is, Logic :yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud: but im bias. Its just down to personal prefernce at the end of the day, they all host vsts, they all offer sequencing of some kind just different interfaces for you to get all confused over.
User avatar
DJ_Stormtrooper
 
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 11:25 pm
Location: Bournemouth

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 5:09 pm

John Ferraris wrote:
Rogue wrote:cubase is for hardware, and only has 12 channels
i said logic is used by drum n bass hardware producers

when it comes down to it, dark dnb is the most complex music to make, cut things short cos i can be bothered, fruity wins hands down, it can do all and more then cubase, same people who use cubase will own 1210s


But you're talking twoddle mate. (windup account?)


nope, its pointless saying anything on here, you be the same as the cdj lovers, when it comes to sequencers, stuck in a magazine world, theres not 1 thing special about cubase or reason, to most cubase is oldskool, even with the latest version, nothing was added that changed the world

the only downfull of fruity, is that you cant set the colors of event graphs, reason is made for your desktop display to be set to 800/600 and its in a locked workspace
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby Seagull Dave U4EA » Tue May 10, 2005 5:27 pm

Rogue wrote:
John Ferraris wrote:
Rogue wrote:cubase is for hardware, and only has 12 channels
i said logic is used by drum n bass hardware producers

when it comes down to it, dark dnb is the most complex music to make, cut things short cos i can be bothered, fruity wins hands down, it can do all and more then cubase, same people who use cubase will own 1210s


But you're talking twoddle mate. (windup account?)


nope, its pointless saying anything on here, you be the same as the cdj lovers, when it comes to sequencers, stuck in a magazine world, theres not 1 thing special about cubase or reason, to most cubase is oldskool, even with the latest version, nothing was added that changed the world

the only downfull of fruity, is that you cant set the colors of event graphs, reason is made for your desktop display to be set to 800/600 and its in a locked workspace


Cubase has only 12 channels?
DnB made on laptops with no hardware?
Only 2 programs used, fruity and reason?
Logic for hardware heads?


You're kidding... you're defo. a windup account... You couldn't be any more misinformed if u tried
Image
:yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
User avatar
Seagull Dave U4EA
 
Posts: 15092
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: London and surrounding counties

Postby Not a Rogue » Tue May 10, 2005 6:01 pm

John Ferraris wrote:
Rogue wrote:
John Ferraris wrote:
Rogue wrote:cubase is for hardware, and only has 12 channels
i said logic is used by drum n bass hardware producers

when it comes down to it, dark dnb is the most complex music to make, cut things short cos i can be bothered, fruity wins hands down, it can do all and more then cubase, same people who use cubase will own 1210s


But you're talking twoddle mate. (windup account?)


nope, its pointless saying anything on here, you be the same as the cdj lovers, when it comes to sequencers, stuck in a magazine world, theres not 1 thing special about cubase or reason, to most cubase is oldskool, even with the latest version, nothing was added that changed the world

the only downfull of fruity, is that you cant set the colors of event graphs, reason is made for your desktop display to be set to 800/600 and its in a locked workspace


Cubase has only 12 channels?
DnB made on laptops with no hardware?
Only 2 programs used, fruity and reason?
Logic for hardware heads?


You're kidding... you're defo. a windup account... You couldn't be any more misinformed if u tried


hardcore stuck in 1995 is a whindup as far as production goes, nearly all dnb is made on a laptop using software only, software sequncers are fruity or reason,

you dont get it, to bad, some people still use crap old artaris

this is done in fruity, name the hardcore anthem
http://irgoslak.org/xremote/untitled2.mp3

so it this jizz
http://irgoslak.org/xremote/t3hman6.mp3
User avatar
Not a Rogue
 
Posts: 2735
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 am

Postby Seagull Dave U4EA » Tue May 10, 2005 6:26 pm

Haha what are u basing ur info on? let me guess... one of ur mates who's a bit 'in the know' says some (innacurate) shite and then u come on here a regurgitate it, claiming it as 'fact' with little or no understanding of what ur actually on about. Loving the work mate!
Image
:yeah, like it's so funny - I'm laughing out loud:
User avatar
Seagull Dave U4EA
 
Posts: 15092
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: London and surrounding counties

Postby Kaine » Tue May 10, 2005 6:45 pm

Rouge has made me laugh so much this week.

Nuff said.

In response to the above in shorthand (me teas in the oven)

DnB heads tend to like analouge overdrive and sounds. I know stright off that Dom & roland, roni size, marcus da intalex, Accidental heros and other's of thier ilk whilst working out rough cuts in software always head back to hardware to finish.

I'd say that none of them use Reason as anything more than a scratch pad and i can bet my life on them all ripping the piss out of anyone who was to mention fruity.

Hardware heads tend to use logic on the apple On the p.c. it's cubase or nuendo.

Last Prodigy album as someone else said wasn't all done on reason... it's a bullshit story that. He wrote it on reason true (as i said.. great scratch pad) but he had to export it to hardware and protools to get the sound phat enough to mixdown.

Cubase is for hardware???

Cubase le your on about. The freebie one.

Cubase proper was the first VST studio style sequencer. It handles a few hundread midi and vst chans. Nuendo handles even more.

(and yes i use nuendo and i use 1210's. I also have cd decks. Whats your point?)

The's ton's of shit cubase does over fruity. The point is that i doubt most people will ever have the need to use any of the extra features.

Go with what makes you creative. What is easy for you and does what you need.

As for you Rouge. If your not a windup account mate you really need to learn about what your chatting about before posting in future. Two threads in a row you've made yourself look like a tit without explaining just what the hell your on about.
"Never offend people with style, when you can offend them with substance"
Kaine
 
Posts: 2431
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 9:13 pm
Location: 2nd on the left

Next

Return to DJs/MCs and Producers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


www.ush.net     Contact us   -   Please read disclaimer   -   Adrates on USH